Unilateral-Dominant Lameness Induces Changes in Breakover Duration Symmetry in Equine Walk

Authors

  • Eloïse Virginia Briggs Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom; INSIGNEO Institute for in silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom
  • Claudia Mazzà Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom; INSIGNEO Institute for in silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom

Keywords:

Breakover, wearable technology, lameness classification, gait analysis, biomechanics, IMU

Abstract

Lameness is widely regarded as the most prevalent problem affecting equines globally. Much is understood about the adjustment of upper body posture to reduce loading in an affected limb. However, the relationship between lameness and breakover duration, when the distal limb experiences high tensile stresses, remains an underinvestigated area. Thus, this study aimed to investigate breakover duration at walk in a cohort of horses, quantifying the effect of fore- and hindlimb lameness. It was hypothesized that lameness would induce an asymmetry between breakover durations of affected contralateral limb pairs. Breakover durations of sixteen horses (five sound and eleven lame, as presented by owners) were measured using data collected by hoof-mounted gyroscopes. Breakover durations of the limbs of contralateral pairs were compared, and paired Student's t-tests were used to determine whether differences were significant (p < 0.01). A high degree of symmetry was seen in breakover durations of sound horses, with a mean (SD) duration of 168(19)ms and a negligible mean absolute difference (6ms, p = 0.07). In lame horses, breakover durations of lame limbs (167(22)ms) were longer than those of contralateral limbs (146(23)ms, p < 0.001); and breakover durations of the ipsilateral (160(26)ms) and diagonal (162(24)ms) limbs were equivalent and comparable to those of sound limb pairs. These results indicate that where there is lameness present in a contralateral limb pair, there will be a breakdown in the symmetry of breakover duration, with the most severely affected limb having a significantly longer breakover duration than the contralateral. This pattern should be investigated in the future as a marker to indicate lameness.

References

Thomason JJ, Peterson ML. Biomechanical and mechanical investigations of the hoof-track interface in racing horses. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 2008;24:53–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2007.11.007.

Eliashar E. An evidence-based assessment of the biomechanical effects of the common shoeing and farriery techniques. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 2007;23:425–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2007.03.010.

Clayton H. Comparison of the stride of trotting horses trimmed with a normal and a broken-back hoof axis. vol. 33, 1988, p. 289–98.

Chateau H, Degueurce C, Denoix J-M. Evaluation of three-dimensional kinematics of the distal portion of the forelimb in horses walking in a straight line. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2004;65:447–55. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.447.

Chateau H, Degueurce C, Denoix J ‐M. Three‐dimensional kinematics of the equine distal forelimb: effects of a sharp turn at the walk. Equine Veterinary Journal 2005;37:12–8. https://doi.org/10.2746/0425164054406946.

Hodson E, Clayton HM, Lanovaz JL. The forelimb in walking horses: 1. Kinematics and ground reaction forces. Equine Veterinary Journal 2000;32:287–94. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516400777032237.

Tijssen M, Hernlund E, Rhodin M, Bosch S, Voskamp JP, Nielen M, et al. Automatic detection of break-over phase onset in horses using hoof-mounted inertial measurement unit sensors. PLoS One 2020;15:e0233649–e0233649. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233649.

Hodson E, Clayton HM, Lanovaz JL. The hindlimb in walking horses: 1. Kinematics and ground reaction forces. Equine Veterinary Journal 2001;33:38–43. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516401776767485.

Clayton HM, Sigafoos R, Curle RD. Effect of three shoe types on the duration of breakover in sound trotting horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 1991;11:129–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-0806(07)80147-x.

Eliashar E, McGuigan MP, Rogers KA, Wilson AM. A comparison of three horseshoeing styles on the kinetics of breakover in sound horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 2002;34:184–90. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516402776767303.

Hagen J, Bos R, Brouwer J, Lux S, Jung FT. Influence of trimming, hoof angle and shoeing on breakover duration in sound horses examined with hoof‐mounted inertial sensors. Veterinary Record 2021;189. https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.450.

Horan K, Coburn J, Kourdache K, Day P, Harborne D, Brinkley L, et al. Influence of speed, ground surface and shoeing condition on hoof breakover duration in galloping Thoroughbred racehorses. Animals (Basel) 2021;11:2588. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092588.

Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. Ground reaction forces: The sine qua non of legged locomotion. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2019;76:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2019.02.022.

Serra Bragança FM, Hernlund E, Thomsen MH, Waldern NM, Rhodin M, Byström A, et al. Adaptation strategies of horses with induced forelimb lameness walking on a treadmill. Equine Veterinary Journal 2021;53:600–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13344.

Ishihara A, Bertone AL, Rajala-Schultz PJ. Association between subjective lameness grade and kinetic gait parameters in horses with experimentally induced forelimb lameness. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2005;66:1805–15. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1805.

Weishaupt MA. Adaptation strategies of horses with lameness. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 2008;24:79–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2007.11.010.

Clayton HM, Schamhardt HC, Willemen MA, Lanovaz JL, Colborne GR. Kinematics and ground reaction forces in horses with superficial digital flexor tendinitis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2000;61:191–6. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.191.

Moorman VJ, Reiser RF, Peterson ML, McIlwraith CW, Kawcak CE. Effect of forelimb lameness on hoof kinematics of horses at a walk. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2013;74:1192–7. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.74.9.1192.

Clayton HM. Cinematographic analysis of the gait of lame horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 1986;6:70–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-0806(86)80037-5.

Clayton HM. Cinematographic analysis of the gait of lame horses II: Chronic sesamoiditis. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 1986;6:310–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-0806(86)80005-3.

Clayton HM. Cinematographic analysis of the gait of lame horses III: Fracture of the third carpal bone. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 1987;7:130–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-0806(87)80020-5.

Tijssen M, Hernlund E, Rhodin M, Bosch S, Voskamp JP, Nielen M, et al. Automatic hoof-on and -off detection in horses using hoof-mounted inertial measurement unit sensors. PLoS One 2020;15:e0233266. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233266.

Briggs EV, Mazzà C. Automatic methods of hoof-on and -off detection in horses using wearable inertial sensors during walk and trot on asphalt, sand and grass. PLoS One 2021;16:e0254813. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254813.

Buchnefp HHF, Savelberg HHCM, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Temporal stride patterns in horses with experimentally induced fore‐ or hindlimb lameness. Equine Veterinary Journal 1995;27:161–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb04911.x.

Gustås P, Johnston C, Drevemo S. Ground reaction force and hoof deceleration patterns on two different surfaces at the trot. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology 2006;3:209–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/s147806150667607x.

Merkens HW, Schamhardt HC. Evaluation of equine locomotion during different degrees of experimentally induced lameness I: Lameness model and quantification of ground reaction force patterns of the limbs. Equine Veterinary Journal 1988;20:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1988.tb04655.x.

Rose RJ. Navicular disease in the horse. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 1996;16:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-0806(96)80061-x.

Clayton HM, Schamhardt HC, Willemen MA, Lanovaz JL, Colborne GR. Net joint moments and joint powers in horses with superficial digital flexor tendinitis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2000;61:197–201. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.197.

Ross MW. Chapter 5 – observation: Symmetry and posture. In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ, editors. Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse, Saint Louis: W.B. Saunders; 2003, p. 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7216-8342-3.50012-7.

Dyson SJ, Tranquille CA, Collins SN, Parkin TDH, Murray RC. External characteristics of the lateral aspect of the hoof differ between non-lame and lame horses. The Veterinary Journal 2011;190:364–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.11.015.

Wright I, Douglas J. Biomechanical considerations in the treatment of navicular disease. Veterinary Record 1993;133:109–14. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.133.5.109.

Pezzanite L, Bass L, Kawcak C, Goodrich L, Moorman V. The relationship between sagittal hoof conformation and hindlimb lameness in the horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 2018;51:464–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13050.

Clements PE, Handel I, McKane SA, Coomer RP. An investigation into the association between plantar distal phalanx angle and hindlimb lameness in aUKpopulation of horses. Equine Veterinary Education 2019;32:52–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.13186.

Mansmann RA, James S, Blikslager AT, vom Orde K. Long toes in the hind feet and pain in the gluteal region: an observational study of 77 horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2010;30:720–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2010.11.007.

Ridgway K, Harman J. Equine back rehabilitation. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 1999;15:263–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30176-1.

de Melo UP, Ferreira C. Multimodal therapy for treatment of equine back pain: a report of 15 cases. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine 2021;43:e003321–e003321. https://doi.org/10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm003321.

Meij HJ, Meij JCP. Functional asymmetry in the motor system of the horse. South African Journal of Science 1980;76:552–6.

Kallerud AS, Fjordbakk CT, Hendrickson EHS, Persson‐Sjodin E, Hammarberg M, Rhodin M, et al. Objectively measured movement asymmetry in yearling Standardbred trotters. Equine Veterinary Journal 2021;53:590–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13302.

Byström A, Clayton HM, Hernlund E, Rhodin M, Egenvall A. Equestrian and biomechanical perspectives on laterality in the horse. Comparative Exercise Physiology 2020;16:35–46. https://doi.org/10.3920/cep190022.

Maliye S, Marshall JF. Objective assessment of the compensatory effect of clinical hind limb lameness in horses: 37 cases (2011–2014). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2016;249:940–4. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.249.8.940.

Kummer M, Geyer H, Imboden I, Auer J, Lischer C. The effect of hoof trimming on radiographic measurements of the front feet of normal Warmblood horses. The Veterinary Journal 2006;172:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.03.008.

Moorman VJ, Reiser RF, Peterson ML, McIlwraith CW, Kawcak CE. Effect of forelimb lameness on hoof kinematics of horses at a trot. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2013;74:1183–91. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.74.9.1183.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-10-31

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Briggs, E. V., & Mazzà, C. (2024). Unilateral-Dominant Lameness Induces Changes in Breakover Duration Symmetry in Equine Walk. International Journal of Equine Science, 3(2), 123–131. https://rasayely-journals.com/index.php/ijes/article/view/127