Are We on the Same Page? A Review of Horse Training Approaches, Terminology Use, and Method Reporting within the Scientific Literature
Keywords:
Horse training, terminology, equine welfare, science communicationAbstract
It is vital that the impact of different horse training approaches (TAs) is studied to ensure the methods employed are effective, ethical, and do not compromise equine welfare. While a range of TAs are referred to within the scientific literature, no research has explored whether the way these are applied, described, and reported is consistent across existing studies. This is problematic as differences in training application and method reporting may alter study outcomes, limit the potential for inter-study comparison, and impede effective scientific communication. A systematic search of the published literature from three online databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed) was used to identify studies that apply horse TAs within their methodology. A description of the training protocols was extracted from each paper and used to categorize the training approach(es) employed, identify their defining characteristics, and assess consistency within TA description. A total of 75 studies published between 1992 and 2021 were reviewed using a mapping review method, within which ten distinct TA categories were identified. Six of these aligned directly with the principles of learning theory; however, distinct differences in their application were identified. The four remaining categories were less clearly defined, with a wider range of terms used to describe them. Limited information provided within some methodologies would render accurate study replication impossible. This study highlights a need for more consistent and detailed reporting of horse TAs within the scientific literature, and subsequently, some initial recommendations to promote this have been made. This would facilitate communication between researchers and further enable comparisons to be made across studies, ultimately improving understanding of modern horse training practices and their welfare impact.
References
Duncan E, Graham R, McManus P. 'No one has even seen… smelt… or sensed a social licence': Animal geographies and social licence to operate. Geoforum 2018;96:318–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.020.
Hampton JO, Jones B, McGreevy PD. Social license and animal welfare: developments from the past decade in Australia. Animals 2020;10:2237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122237.
Holmes TQ, Brown AF. Champing at the bit for improvements: a review of equine welfare in equestrian sports in the United Kingdom. Animals 2022;12:1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091186.
Wolframm IA, Douglas J, Pearson G. Changing hearts and minds in the equestrian world one behaviour at a time. Animals (Basel) 2023;13:748. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040748.
Graham R, McManus P. Changing human-animal relationships in sport: an analysis of the UK and Australian horse racing whips debates. Animals (Basel) 2016;6:32. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6050032.
Williams J, Greening L, Marlin D, Randle H. Understanding whip use in riders in sports horse disciplines: International Society for Equitation Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada: 2019.
Furtado T, Perkins E, Pinchbeck G, McGowan C, Watkins F, Christley R. Exploring horse owners' understanding of obese body condition and weight management in UK leisure horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 2021;53:752–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13360.
Horseman SV, Buller H, Mullan S, Whay HR. Current welfare problems facing horses in Great Britain as identified by equine stakeholders. PLoS One 2016;11:e0160269–e0160269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160269.
Havlik HS. Equestrian sport-related injuries. Current Sports Medicine Reports 2010;9:299–302. https://doi.org/10.1249/jsr.0b013e3181f32056.
Starling M, McLean A, McGreevy P. The contribution of equitation science to minimising horse-related risks to humans. Animals (Basel) 2016;6:15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6030015.
Goodwin D, McGreevy P, Waran N, McLean A. How equitation science can elucidate and refine horsemanship techniques. The Veterinary Journal 2009;181:5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.023.
Baragli P, Padalino B, Telatin A. The role of associative and non-associative learning in the training of horses and implications for the welfare (a review). Annali Dell'Istituto Superiore Di Sanita 2015;51:40–51. https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_15_01_08.
McGreevy PD, McLean AN. Roles of learning theory and ethology in equitation. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2007;2:108–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2007.05.003.
McLean AN, Christensen JW. The application of learning theory in horse training. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2017;190:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.020.
McGreevy PD. The advent of equitation science. The Veterinary Journal 2007;174:492–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.09.008.
Randle H, Waran N. Equitation science in practice: how collaboration, communication and change can improve equine welfare. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2019;29:viii–x. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2018.12.014.
Pierard M, Hall C, König von Borstel U, Averis A, Hawson L, McLean A, et al. Evolving protocols for research in equitation science. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2015;10:255–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2015.01.006.
Randle H, Waran N. Breaking down barriers and dispelling myths: the need for a scientific approach to equitation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2017;190:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.010.
Randle H. Welfare friendly equitation - Understanding horses to improve training and performance. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2016;15:vii–viii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2016.10.005.
Thompson K, Haigh L. Perceptions of Equitation Science revealed in an online forum: Improving equine health and welfare by communicating science to equestrians and equestrian to scientists. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2018;25:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2018.02.002.
Brown SM, Connor M. Understanding and application of learning theory in UK-based equestrians. Anthrozoös 2017;30:565–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2017.1370216.
Guinnefollau L, Gee EK, Bolwell CF, Norman EJ, Rogers CW. Benefits of animal exposure on veterinary students' understanding of equine behaviour and self-assessed equine handling skills. Animals (Basel) 2019;9:620. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090620.
Luke KL, McAdie T, Warren-Smith AK, Rawluk A, Smith BP. Does a working knowledge of learning theory relate to improved horse welfare and rider safety? Anthrozoös 2023;36:703–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2023.2166713.
Warren-Smith AK, McGreevy PD. Equestrian coaches' understanding and application of learning theory in horse training. Anthrozoös 2008;21:153–62. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303708x305800.
Dumbell L, Lemon C, Williams J. A systematic literature review to evaluate the tools and methods used to measure rein tension. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2019;29:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2018.04.003.
Leenaars C, Tsaioun K, Stafleu F, Rooney K, Meijboom F, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, et al. Reviewing the animal literature: how to describe and choose between different types of literature reviews. Laboratory Animals 2021;55:129–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677220968599.
Fenner K, Hyde M, Crean A, McGreevy P. Identifying sources of potential bias when using online survey data to explore horse training, management, and behaviour: a systematic literature review. Veterinary Sciences 2020;7:140. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7030140.
McLean A, Varnum A, Ali A, Heleski C, Navas González FJ. Comparing and contrasting knowledge on mules and hinnies as a tool to comprehend their behavior and improve their welfare. Animals (Basel) 2019;9:488. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080488.
Osthaus B, Proops L, Hocking I, Burden F. Spatial cognition and perseveration by horses, donkeys and mules in a simple A-not-B detour task. Animal Cognition 2013;16:301–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0589-4.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2021;134:178–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001.
Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy 2005;85:257–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/85.3.257.
Duncan IJH. The changing concept of animal sentience. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2006;100:11–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.011.
Proctor H. Animal sentience: where are we and where are we heading? Animals (Basel) 2012;2:628–39. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani2040628.
McLean AN, McGreevy PD. Ethical equitation: Capping the price horses pay for human glory. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2010;5:203–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2010.04.003.
McLean AN, McGreevy PD. Horse-training techniques that may defy the principles of learning theory and compromise welfare. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2010;5:187–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2010.04.002.
Kieson E, Felix C, Webb S, Abramson CI. The effects of a choice test between food rewards and human interaction in a herd of domestic horses of varying breeds and experiences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2020;231:105075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105075.
McLean A, McGreevy P. Chapter 13 - Training. In: McGreevy P, editor. Equine Behavior, Oxford: W.B. Saunders; 2004, p. 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-2634-8.50018-6.
Waran N, McGreevy P, Casey RA. Training methods and horse welfare. In: Waran N, editor. The Welfare of Horses, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2007, p. 151–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48215-1_7.
McGreevy PD, Oddie C, Burton FL, McLean AN. The horse–human dyad: Can we align horse training and handling activities with the equid social ethogram? The Veterinary Journal 2009;181:12–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.005.
DeAraugo J, McLean A, McLaren S, Caspar G, McLean M, McGreevy P. Training methodologies differ with the attachment of humans to horses. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2014;9:235–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2014.05.001.
McLean AN. The positive aspects of correct negative reinforcement. Anthrozoös 2005;18:245–54. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279305785594072.
Egenvall A, Eisersiö M, Roepstorff L. Pilot study of behavior responses in young riding horses using 2 methods of making transitions from trot to walk. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2012;7:157–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2011.08.006.
Warren-Smith AK, McLean AN, Nicol HI, McGreevy PD. Variations in the timing of reinforcement as a training technique for foals (Equus caballus). Anthrozoös 2005;18:255–72. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279305785594117.
Riemer S, Ellis SLH, Thompson H, Burman OHP. Reinforcer effectiveness in dogs—The influence of quantity and quality. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2018;206:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.05.016.
Vicars SM, Miguel CF, Sobie JL. Assessing preference and reinforcer effectiveness in dogs. Behavioural Processes 2014;103:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2013.11.006.
Baumgartner M, Boisson T, Erhard MH, Zeitler-Feicht MH. Common feeding practices pose a risk to the welfare of horses when kept on non-edible bedding. Animals (Basel) 2020;10:411. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030411.
Clauss M, Schiele K, Ortmann S, Fritz J, Codron D, Hummel J, et al. The effect of very low food intake on digestive physiology and forage digestibility in horses. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 2014;98:107–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12053.
Avey MT, Moher D, Sullivan KJ, Fergusson D, Griffin G, Grimshaw JM, et al. The devil is in the details: incomplete reporting in preclinical animal research. PLoS One 2016;11:e0166733–e0166733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166733.
Strech D, Dirnagl U. 3Rs missing: animal research without scientific value is unethical. BMJ Open Science 2019;3:bmjos-2018-000048. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2018-000048.
Kimura R, Borankulova S, Maratbek SZh. Effect of difference in training skills on stress in horses trained by Kazakh trainers. Animal Science Journal 2023;94. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13800.
Kydd E, Padalino B, Henshall C, McGreevy P. An analysis of equine round pen training videos posted online: Differences between amateur and professional trainers. PLoS One 2017;12:e0184851–e0184851. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184851.
Anzulewicz A, Fenner K, Hyde M, Heald S, Burattini B, Romness N, et al. The impact of the sex of handlers and riders on the reported social confidence, compliance and touch sensitivity of horses in their care. Animals (Basel) 2021;11:130. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010130.
Ijichi C, Griffin K, Squibb K, Favier R. Stranger danger? An investigation into the influence of human-horse bond on stress and behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2018;206:59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.05.034.
d'Ingeo S, Quaranta A, Siniscalchi M, Stomp M, Coste C, Bagnard C, et al. Horses associate individual human voices with the valence of past interactions: a behavioural and electrophysiological study. Scientific Reports 2019;9:11568–11568. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47960-5.
Hartmann E, Christensen JW, McGreevy PD. Dominance and leadership: useful concepts in human–horse interactions? Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2017;52:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2017.01.015.
Sankey C, Richard-Yris M-A, Leroy H, Henry S, Hausberger M. Positive interactions lead to lasting positive memories in horses, Equus caballus. Animal Behaviour 2010;79:869–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.037.
Proops L, Walton M, McComb K. The use of human-given cues by domestic horses, Equus caballus, during an object choice task. Animal Behaviour 2010;79:1205–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.015.
Proops L, Rayner J, Taylor AM, McComb K. The responses of young domestic horses to human-given cues. PLoS One 2013;8:e67000–e67000. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067000.
Proops L, McComb K. Attributing attention: the use of human-given cues by domestic horses (Equus caballus). Animal Cognition 2010;13:197–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0257-5.
Henshall C. The effect of exercise and stress on equine learning, memory and welfare. Doctoral Thesis. Charles Sturt University, 2022.
McGreevy PD, McLean AN. Punishment in horse-training and the concept of ethical equitation. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2009;4:193–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2008.08.001.
Nicol CJ. Equine learning: progress and suggestions for future research. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2002;78:193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1591(02)00093-x.
Pfaller-Sadovsky N, Hurtado-Parrado C, Cardillo D, Medina LG, Friedman SG. What's in a click? The efficacy of conditioned reinforcement in applied animal training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Animals (Basel) 2020;10:1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101757.
Glasziou P, Meats E, Heneghan C, Shepperd S. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? BMJ 2008;336:1472–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39590.732037.47.
Leung V, Rousseau-Blass F, Beauchamp G, Pang DSJ. ARRIVE has not ARRIVEd: support for the arrive (animal research: reporting of in vivo experiments) guidelines does not improve the reporting quality of papers in animal welfare, analgesia or anesthesia. PLoS One 2018;13:e0197882–e0197882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197882.
Percie du Sert N, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, Browne WJ, et al. Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. Plos Biology 2020;18:e3000411–e3000411. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411.
Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 2020;40:1769–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X20943823.
Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics 2010;1:94–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.72351.
Leach DH, Ormrod K, Clayton HM. Standardised terminology for the description and analysis of equine locomotion. Equine Veterinary Journal 1984;16:522–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1984.tb02007.x.
ManyDogs Project, Alberghina D, Bray EE, Buchsbaum D, Byosiere S-E, Espinosa J, et al. Manydogs project: A big team science approach to investigating canine behavior and cognition. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews 2023;18:59–77. https://doi.org/10.3819/ccbr.2023.180004.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ella Bartlett, Emily J. Blackwell, Lorna J. Cameron, Jo Hockenhull
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
