Temporal Trends in Equine Sperm Motility and Semen Volume: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single UK Breeding Facility
Keywords:
Equine, fertility, horse, motility, sperm, semen volume, temporal trendsAbstract
The equine industry preferentially selects sires based on pedigree, performance, and conformation, with little concern given to fertility. Increasing evidence supports the theory of geographic-sensitive declines in a range of semen quality parameters, yet the horse is underrepresented within this field. Data presented here retrospectively investigates trends in semen quality from a population of stallions at a single UK breeding facility (from 2001 to 2020). Data on stallion sperm motility (10,686 ejaculates, 984 stallions) and semen volume (11,122 ejaculates, 1,030 stallions) were collected from records during the years 2020 and 2021. Data were analyzed as isolated variables in a linear mixed model (REML). Fixed effects included significant covariates (year of collection, age, and abstinence period). Random effects included stallion and sample numbers. Overall trends indicated that motility has declined over the past 20 years (p < 0.001; overall decline: 12.19%). Motility declined similarly in both prime and senescent stallions, confirming trends are not age-specific. Trends in volume (p < 0.001) varied over time but typically increased (5.70 mL overall; 0.28 mL annually). Results suggest stallions could be at risk of perturbed reproductive health and function in the future, with serious implications for the economic status of breeding stallions and the health and welfare of breeding stock.
References
Tiegs AW, Landis J, Garrido N, Scott RT, Hotaling JM. Total motile sperm count trend over time: evaluation of semen analyses from 119,972 men from subfertile couples. Urology 2019;132:109–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.06.038.
Rolland M, Le Moal J, Wagner V, Royère D, De Mouzon J. Decline in semen concentration and morphology in a sample of 26,609 men close to general population between 1989 and 2005 in France. Human Reproduction 2013;28:462–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des415.
Adiga S, Jayaraman V, Kalthur G, Upadhya D, Kumar P. Declining semen quality among south Indian infertile men: A retrospective study. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences 2008;1:15–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.38972.
Splingart C, Frapsauce C, Veau S, Barthélémy C, Royère D, Guérif F. Semen variation in a population of fertile donors: evaluation in a French centre over a 34‐year period. International Journal of Andrology 2012;35:467–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01229.x.
Wahl RL, Reif JS. Temporal trends in bull semen quality: A comparative model for human health? Environmental Research 2009;109:273–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.10.012.
Lea RG, Byers AS, Sumner RN, Rhind SM, Zhang Z, Freeman SL, et al. Environmental chemicals impact dog semen quality in vitro and may be associated with a temporal decline in sperm motility and increased cryptorchidism. Scientific Reports 2016;6:31281–31281. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31281.
Maziero RRD, Guaitolini CR de F, Guasti PN, Monteiro GA, Martin I, Silva JPM da, et al. Effect of using two cryopreservation methods on viability and fertility of frozen stallion sperm. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2019;72:37–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2018.10.008.
Varner DD, Gibb Z, Aitken RJ. Stallion fertility: a focus on the spermatozoon. Equine Veterinary Journal 2015;47:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12308.
Harris IT, Maddock C, Farnworth M, Nankervis K, Perrett J, Pyatt AZ, et al. Temporal trends in equine sperm progressive motility: a systematic review and meta-regression. Reproduction 2023;165:M1–10. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-22-0490.
Fisch H. Declining worldwide sperm counts: disproving a myth. Urologic Clinics of North America 2008;35:137–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2008.01.001.
Pacey AA. Are sperm counts declining? Or did we just change our spectacles? Asian Journal of Andrology 2013;15:187–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2012.165.
Multigner L, Magistrini M, Ducot B, Spira A. Secular sperm trends in stallions between 1981 and 1996. Journal of Andrology 1999;20:763–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1999.tb03383.x.
Wilson M, Flesner AT. A preliminary comparison of semen quality between competing and non-competing equine Stallions. Journal of Veterinary Science & Technology 2017;08. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7579.1000443.
Darr CR, Moraes LE, Scanlan TN, Baumber-Skaife J, Loomis PR, Cortopassi GA, et al. Sperm mitochondrial function is affected by stallion age and predicts post-thaw motility. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2017;50:52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2016.10.015.
Pirosanto Y, Valera M, Molina A, Dorado J, Demyda-Peyrás S. 23 sperm quality of pure Spanish Stallions is affected by inbreeding coefficient and age. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 2020;32:137. https://doi.org/10.1071/rdv32n2ab23.
Gottschalk M, Sieme H, Martinsson G, Distl O. Heritability of semen traits in German warmblood stallions. Animal Reproduction Science 2016;170:10–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.03.004.
Wilson M, Williams J, Montrose VT, Williams J. Variance in stallion semen quality among equestrian sporting disciplines and competition levels. Animals (Basel) 2019;9:485. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080485.
Aurich C. Reprint of: Seasonal influences on cooled-shipped and frozen-thawed stallion semen. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2016;43:S1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2016.07.007.
Albrizio M, Lacalandra GM, Volpe S, Nicassio M, Cinone M. Heat shock proteins in equine spermatozoa: expression and correlation to kinetic and environmental parameters. Theriogenology 2020;155:185–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.05.042.
Sieme H, Katila T, Klug E. Effect of semen collection practices on sperm characteristics before and after storage and on fertility of stallions. Theriogenology 2004;61:769–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(03)00251-6.
Brinsko SP, Varner DD, Love CC, Blanchard TL, Day BC, Wilson ME. Effect of feeding a DHA-enriched nutriceutical on the quality of fresh, cooled and frozen stallion semen. Theriogenology 2005;63:1519–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.07.010.
Whigham A, Blanchard T, Love C, Teague S, Brinsko S, Welsh T, et al. Equine semen quality following sperm exposure to seminal plasma stored under different conditions. Clinical Theriogenology 2014;6:459–66.
Ebel F, Vallejos A, Gajardo G, Ulloa O, Clavel E, Enric J. Semen quality and freezability analysis during breeding and non-breeding seasons in heavy draft stallions in southern Chile. Andrologia 2020;52:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13797.
Ellerbrock R, Canisso I, Feijo L, Lima F, Shipley C, Kline K. Diagnosis and effects of urine contamination in cooled-extended stallion semen. Theriogenology 2016;85:1219–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.12.002.
Turner CE, Walbornn SR, Blanchard TL, Varner DD, Brinsko SP, LaCaze KA, et al. The effect of two levels of hemospermia on stallion fertility. Theriogenology 2016;86:1399–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.084.
Curran-Everett D, Benos DJ. Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 2004;287:R247–9. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00346.2004.
Verbyla AP. A note on model selection using information criteria for general linear models estimated using REML. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics 2019;61:39–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/anzs.12254.
Levine H, Jørgensen N, Martino-Andrade A, Mendiola J, Weksler-Derri D, Mindlis I, et al. Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Human Reproduction Update 2017;23:646–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmx022.
Björndahl L, Kirkman Brown J. The sixth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen: ensuring quality and standardization in basic examination of human ejaculates. Fertility and Sterility 2022;117:246–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.12.012.
Varner DD. Approaches to breeding soundness examination and interpretation of results. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2016;43:S37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2016.06.075.
Love CC. Relationship between sperm motility, morphology and the fertility of stallions. Theriogenology 2011;76:547–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.03.007.
Love CC, Noble JK, Standridge SA, Bearden CT, Blanchard TL, Varner DD, et al. The relationship between sperm quality in cool-shipped semen and embryo recovery rate in horses. Theriogenology 2015;84:1587-1593.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.08.008.
Jasko DJ, Little TV, Lein DH, Foote RH. Comparison of spermatozoal movement and semen characteristics with fertility in stallions: 64 cases (1987-1988). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1992;200:979–85. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.1992.200.07.979.
Wang L, Zhang L, Song X-H, Zhang H-B, Xu C-Y, Chen Z-J. Decline of semen quality among Chinese sperm bank donors within 7 years (2008-2014). Asian Journal of Andrology 2017;19:521–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.179533.
Mínguez-Alarcón L, Williams PL, Chiu Y-H, Gaskins AJ, Nassan FL, Dadd R, et al. Secular trends in semen parameters among men attending a fertility center between 2000 and 2017: Identifying potential predictors. Environment International 2018;121:1297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.10.052.
Dini P, Bartels T, Revah I, Claes AN, Stout TAE, Daels P. A retrospective study on semen quality parameters from four different Dutch horse breeds with different levels of inbreeding. Theriogenology 2020;157:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.07.017.
Umesiobi DO, Iloeje M. Effect of sexual teasing and diurnal period of semen collection on reaction time and semen characteristics of Large White boars. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment 1999;1:231–5.
Matson PL, Myssonski K, Yovich S, Morrison L, Irving J, Bakos HW. The density of human semen and the validation of weight as an indicator of volume: a multicentre study. Reproductive Biology 2010;10:141–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1642-431x(12)60056-4.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Imogen Thea Harris, Kathryn Nankervis, Alison Pyatt, David Stuart Gardner, Pamela Humphreys, Rebecca Nicole Blanchard
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
