The Meaning of the Place – A Socio-Spatial Analysis of Equine Yards
Keywords:
Socio-spatial analysis, biodiversity, equine welfare, financial sustainability, agroecological transitionAbstract
Climate change and biodiversity loss are interconnected global challenges that require urgent and transformative changes in land use and management. Equine yards have a unique potential to contribute positively to biodiversity while supporting equine welfare and providing economic and social value. This study explores the perspectives of equine yard owners in Germany and the Netherlands regarding the socio-spatial aspects they consider important when designing and managing equine yards that balance biodiversity, equine welfare, and operational needs. The research employed a qualitative socio-spatial analysis framework, drawing on semi-structured interviews with 17 equine yard owners. The findings reveal that a wide range of socio-spatial aspects—including land use, social infrastructure, accessibility, and the integration of biodiversity—play significant roles in yard design and management. Cultural differences were also observed, with German yards generally emphasizing safety and seclusion, while Dutch yards focused on controlled access and integration into the local community. The study highlights the challenges of balancing equine welfare, biodiversity, and community needs, particularly in relation to land availability, accessibility, and cultural contexts. Despite the focus on a limited number of yards in Germany and the Netherlands, the findings provide valuable insights into the socio-spatial factors that shape equine yard management. A set of preliminary guidelines for yard design is proposed, emphasizing the integration of equine welfare, biodiversity, community engagement, and sustainable business practices to enhance the contribution of equine yards to the agroecological transition.
References
Calvin K, Dasgupta D, Krinner G, Mukherji A, Thorne PW, Trisos C, et al. IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC; 2023.
Isbell F, Gonzalez A, Loreau M, Cowles J, Díaz S, Hector A, et al. Linking the influence and dependence of people on biodiversity across scales. Nature 2017;546:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22899.
Díaz S, Settele J, Brondízio ES, Ngo HT, Agard J, Arneth A, et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 2019;366. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100.
Benton TG, Bieg C, Harwatt H, Pudasaini R, Wellesley L. Food system impacts on biodiversity loss. Chatham House 2021.
Ortiz AMD, Outhwaite CL, Dalin C, Newbold T. A review of the interactions between biodiversity, agriculture, climate change, and international trade: research and policy priorities. One Earth 2021;4:88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.12.008.
European Commission. Approved 28 CAP Strategic Plans (2023-2027) summary overview for 27 Member States Facts and figures 2023.
IFCE. Green assets of equine in Europe 2022.
Rzekęć A, Vial C, Bigot G. Green assets of equines in the European context of the Ecological Transition of Agriculture. Animals (Basel) 2020;10:106. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010106.
Elgåker HE. The new equine sector and its influence on multifunctional land use in peri-urban areas. GeoJournal 2012;77:591–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-010-9398-y.
Prokopy LS, Perry-Hill R, Reimer AP. Equine farm operators: An underserved target audience for conservation practice outreach? Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2011;31:447–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2011.01.008.
Elgåker H. Horse keeping in peri-urban areas. PhD Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2011.
Nasiri M, Rantala T, Saunila M, Ukko J, Rantanen H. Transition towards sustainable solutions: product, service, technology, and business model. Sustainability 2018;10:358. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020358.
Wolframm IA, Heric L, Allen AM. Green treasures: Investigating the biodiversity potential of equine yards through the presence and quality of landscape features in the Netherlands. PLoS One 2024;19:e0301168–e0301168. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301168.
Wilton B. A unique rurality: Exploring the role of the horse farm in the post-productivist rural landscape. PhD Thesis. University of Guelph, 2008.
EHN. Horse industry's econmic impact. European Horse Network 2024. https://www.europeanhorsenetwork.eu/horse-industry/economic-impact/ (accessed October 28, 2024).
International Sport Horse Confederation. Protecting the EU equine industry and equine health and welfare 2020.
Performance of the agricultural sector. EuroStat 2024. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Performance_of_the_agricultural_sector (accessed November 8, 2024).
FN. Jahresbericht 2023.
KNHS. Paardrijden doet wat met je - Jaarverslag KNHS 2022.
Grandgeorge M, Hausberger M. Human-animal relationships: From daily life to animal-assisted therapies. Annali Dell'Istituto Superiore Di Sanita 2011;47:397–408. https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_11_04_12.
Scopa C, Contalbrigo L, Greco A, Lanatà A, Scilingo EP, Baragli P. Emotional transfer in human-horse interaction: new perspectives on equine assisted interventions. Animals (Basel) 2019;9:1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9121030.
Wadham H, Wallace C, Furtado T. Agents of sustainability: How horses and people co-create, enact and embed the good life in rural places. Sociologia Ruralis 2023;63:390–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12387.
Garrido P, Mårell A, Öckinger E, Skarin A, Jansson A, Thulin C. Experimental rewilding enhances grassland functional composition and pollinator habitat use. Journal of Applied Ecology 2019;56:946–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13338.
Garrido P, Naumov V, Söderquist L, Jansson A, Thulin C-G. Effects of experimental rewilding on butterflies, bumblebees and grasshoppers. Journal of Insect Conservation 2022;26:763–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-022-00420-4.
Schmitz A, Isselstein J. Effect of grazing system on grassland plant species richness and vegetation characteristics: comparing horse and cattle grazing. Sustainability 2020;12:3300. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083300.
Mutillod C, Buisson E, Tatin L, Mahy G, Dufrêne M, Mesléard F, et al. Managed as wild, horses influence grassland vegetation differently than domestic herds. Biological Conservation 2024;290:110469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110469.
Ringmark S, Skarin A, Jansson A. Impact of year-round grazing by horses on pasture nutrient dynamics and the correlation with pasture nutrient content and fecal nutrient composition. Animals (Basel) 2019;9:500. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080500.
Hüppe CF, Schmitz A, Tonn B, Isselstein J. The role of socio-economic determinants of horse farms for grassland management, vegetation composition and ecological value. Sustainability 2020;12:10641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410641.
Fraser MD, Vallin HE, Roberts BP. Animal board invited review: Grassland-based livestock farming and biodiversity. Animal 2022;16:100671–100671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100671.
Aman A, Rafiq M, Dastane O, Sabir AA. Green Corridor: A critical perspective and development of research agenda. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2022;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.982473.
Tiang DCF, Morris A, Bell M, Gibbins CN, Azhar B, Lechner AM. Ecological connectivity in fragmented agricultural landscapes and the importance of scattered trees and small patches. Ecological Processes 2021;10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-021-00284-7.
van Goorbergh F. Sociaalruimtelijke analyse: het gebruik van de openbare ruimte onderzocht. In: Simons W, van Dorp D, editors. Uitgeverij Landwerk, The Netherlands: Wageningen; 2022.
PDOK. PDOK Natura 2000 (WMS) - Overview. Publieke Dienstverlening Op de Kaart 2023. https://hsvhl.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=79938f707b1a49fd92f8affba4f0361f (accessed April 15, 2024).
CBS. Bestand bodemgebruik 2024.
Esri NL. Bodemkaart. Esri Nederland 2021. https://hsvhl.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=de58bafde7284c99836a54519fa9f3cd (accessed April 15, 2024).
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006;3:77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Knuth M, Wei X, Zhang X, Khachatryan H. Homeowners' prioritization of landscape features regarding aesthetic, environmental, financial, and psychological benefits. HortTechnology 2023;33:535–43. https://doi.org/10.21273/horttech05249-23.
Larson KL, Nelson KC, Samples SR, Hall SJ, Bettez N, Cavender-Bares J, et al. Ecosystem services in managing residential landscapes: priorities, value dimensions, and cross-regional patterns. Urban Ecosystems 2016;19:95–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0477-1.
Peter S, Le Provost G, Mehring M, Müller T, Manning P. Cultural worldviews consistently explain bundles of ecosystem service prioritisation across rural Germany. People and Nature 2022;4:218–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10277.
Baumgartner M, Kuhnke S, Hülsbergen K-J, Erhard MH, Zeitler-Feicht MH. Improving horse welfare and environmental sustainability in horse husbandry: linkage between turnout and nitrogen surplus. Sustainability 2021;13:8991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168991.
European Commission. EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: bringing nature back into our lives. Com/2020/380 final 2020.
Chen W, Haiyun X, PLIENINGER T. Intangible bonds: Cultural ecosystem services and landscape practices. Landscape Architecture Frontiers 2022;10:4. https://doi.org/10.15302/j-laf-1-010027.
Hedenborg S, Kronborg M, Sätre A, Radmann A, Torell Palmquist G, Andersson P. Pro-environmental transformation of the equine sector-facilitators and challenges. Animals (Basel) 2024;14:915. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14060915.
Meraner M, Heijman W, Kuhlman T, Finger R. Determinants of farm diversification in the Netherlands. Land Use Policy 2015;42:767–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.013.
Isbell F, Balvanera P, Mori AS, He J, Bullock JM, Regmi GR, et al. Expert perspectives on global biodiversity loss and its drivers and impacts on people. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2023;21:94–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2536.
Natarajan L. Socio-spatial learning: A case study of community knowledge in participatory spatial planning. Progress in Planning 2017;111:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2015.06.002.
Røe PG. Analysing place and place-making: urbanization in suburban Oslo. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2014;38:498–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12113.
Ellery PJ, Ellery J, Borkowsky M. Toward a theoretical understanding of placemaking. International Journal of Community Well-Being 2020;4:55–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-020-00078-3.
Hedenborg S, Palmquist GT, Rosén A. The emergence of the Swedish horse-riding school from the mid-twentieth century. The International Journal of the History of Sport 2021;38:607–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2021.1959321.
Hargreaves T. Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture 2011;11:79–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540510390500.
Morris J, Marzano M, Dandy N, O'Brien L. Forestry, sustainable behaviours and behaviour change: interventions – lessons learned from interventions and evaluations 2012.
Collier D, Mahoney J. Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics 1996;49:56–91. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1996.0023.
Mehra B. Bias in qualitative research: voices from an online classroom. The Qualitative Report 2015. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2002.1986.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Inga Wolframm, Tyara Scheer, Luisa Linnenberg, Sharon Rechterschot
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
