Prevalence and Perceived Effects of Enrichment Elements in Outdoor Areas on the Behavior and Welfare of Group-Housed Horses

Nicole Miggitsch; Cynthia Joanne  Naydani; Bryony E.  Lancaster

doi:10.64292/ijes.192

Authors

Nicole Miggitsch Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3581-6923
Cynthia Joanne Naydani Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2514-7119
Bryony E. Lancaster Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0558-8467

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64292/ijes.192

Keywords:

Equine enrichment, equine welfare, environmental enrichment, husbandry, positive welfare

Abstract

Environmental enrichment has the potential to cultivate positive equine welfare through agency-driven opportunities for socialization, foraging, and exploration. Although the beneficial impacts of enrichment are well documented for captive wildlife, there is comparatively little research on the applications and impacts of enrichment for domestic horses. Our aim was to understand the use and perceived impacts of enrichment for group-housed horses through a global survey of barn owners/managers. The survey asked questions on demographics, horses, and facility characteristics, as well as the use and perceived effects of foraging, structural, and sensory enrichment on horse behavior and welfare (e.g., perceived effects on health issues and stereotypies). We received 132 responses from 16 countries. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics and visualizations. Fisher's exact tests were used to explore the significance of reported behavior changes, and a chi-squared test was used to examine the relationship between the size of the turnout area and the number of enrichment elements. Enrichment elements providing horses with foraging opportunities were the most prevalent type of enrichment, while offering structural diversity and sensory stimulation were also much-utilized enrichment strategies. Respondent data suggested a significant, direct relationship between the prevalence of enrichment and positive behavior change (p < 0.001). Respondents reported an increase in natural behaviors since the onset of enrichment provision, including increased foraging (66.7%), play (65.2%), and locomotion (78.8%). They also reported their horses to be calmer (forage enrichment 30.5%, structural enrichment 13.8%, sensory enrichment 7.4%), more social (forage enrichment 9.4%, structural enrichment 8.9%, sensory enrichment 2.8%), and more confident when being handled on the ground and under saddle (structural enrichment 8.1%). Most respondents reported that providing enrichment elements improved the health issues their horses were dealing with (hoof problems 88.7%, laminitis 91.7%, EMS 89.6%, lameness 93.5%, equine asthma 88.5%, others 88.9%) and indicated decreased frequencies of stereotypic behaviors (weaving 100%, box/fence walking 100%, crib-biting 66.6%, others 50%). No significant relationship was found between the size of the turnout area and the number of enrichment items (p = 0.33). Overall, these findings suggest positive impacts of environmental enrichment on the behavior and welfare of group-housed horses, warranting further research as a potential welfare-enhancing tool.

References

Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ. Extending the 'Five Domains' model for animal welfare assessment to incorporate positive welfare states. Animal Welfare 2015;24(3):241–53. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.24.3.241.

Hall C, Kay R. Living the good life? A systematic review of behavioural signs of affective state in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) and factors relating to quality of life. Part I: Fulfilment of species-specific needs. Animal Welfare 2024;33:e40. https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2024.38.

Auer U, Kelemen Z, Engl V, Jenner F. Activity time budgets-a potential tool to monitor equine welfare? Animals 2021;11(3):850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030850.

Ritzler CP, Lukas KE, Bernstein-Kurtycz LM, Koester DC. The effects of choice-based design and management on the behavior and space use of zoo-housed Amur tigers (Panthera tigris altaica). Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 2021;26(2):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2021.1958684.

Rault JL, Bateson M, Boissy A, Forkman B, Grinde B, Gygax L, et al. A consensus on the definition of positive animal welfare. Journal of Biology Letters 2025;21(1):20240382. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2024.0382.

Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ, Littlewood KE, McLean AN, McGreevy PD, Jones B, et al. The 2020 five domains model: including human-animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare. Animals 2020;10(10):1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101870.

Ellis AD, Fell M, Luck K, Gill L, Owen H, Briars H, et al. Effect of forage presentation on feed intake behaviour in stabled horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2015;165:88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.01.010.

Goodwin D, Davidson HPB, Harris P. Foraging enrichment for stabled horses: effects on behaviour and selection. Equine Veterinary Journal 2002;34(7):686–91. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516402776250450.

Hoffmann G, Bentke A, Rose-Meierhofer S, Berg W, Mazetti P, Hardarson GH. Influence of an active stable system on the behavior and body condition of Icelandic horses. Animal 2012;6(10):1684–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112000699.

Skibiel AL, Trevino HS, Naugher K. Comparison of several types of enrichment for captive felids. Zoo Biology 2007;26(5):371–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20147.

Soriano AI, Vinyoles D, Mate C. long-term macroevaluation of environmental enrichment in three brown bears (Ursus arctos) at Barcelona zoo. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 2016;19(1):49–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2015.1106320.

Bulens A, Van Beirendonck S, Van Thielen J, Driessen B. The enriching effect of non-commercial items in stabled horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2013;143(1):46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.11.012.

Hartman N, Greening LM. a preliminary study investigating the influence of auditory stimulation on the occurrence of nocturnal equine sleep-related behavior in stabled horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2019;82:102782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2019.07.003.

Hernderson JV, Waran NK. Reducing equine stereotypies using an equiballTM. Animal Welfare 2001;10(1):73–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600023277.

Moore-Colyer MJS, Hemmings A, Hewer N. A preliminary investigation into the effect of ad libitum or restricted hay with or without Horslyx on the intake and switching behaviour of normal and crib biting horses. Livestock Science 2016;186:59–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.07.021.

Jørgensen GHM, Liestøl SH-O, Bøe KE. Effects of enrichment items on activity and social interactions in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2011;129(2–4):100–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.11.004.

Lansade L, Lemarchand J, Reigner F, Arnould C, Bertin A. Automatic brushes induce positive emotions and foster positive social interactions in group-housed horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2022;246:105538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105538.

Lansade L, Valenchon M, Foury A, Neveux C, Cole SW, Laye S, et al. behavioral and transcriptomic fingerprints of an enriched environment in horses (Equus caballus). PLoS One 2014;9(12):e114384. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114384.

Jackson J. Paddock Paradise - A guide to natural horse boarding. Star Ridge Publishing; 2015.

Noble GK. Horse husbandry-nutrition, management and welfare. Animals 2023;13(1):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010169.

Harvey AM, Ramp D, Mellor DJ. Review of the foundational knowledge required for assessing horse welfare. Animals 2022;12(23):3385. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12233385.

Bulens A, Dams A, Van Beirendonck S, Van Thielen J, Driessen B. A preliminary study on the long-term interest of horses in ropes and Jolly Balls. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2015;10(1):83–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2014.08.003.

Jørgensen GHM, Hanche-Olsen Listøl S, Bøe KE. Use of different items of "enrichment" for individual and group kept horses. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2010;5(4):216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2009.10.039.

Keeling LJ. Indicators of good welfare. In: Choe JC, editor. Encyclopedia of animal behavior. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2019. p. 134–40.

Rioja-Lang FC, Connor M, Bacon H, Dwyer CM. Determining a welfare prioritization for horses using a Delphi method. Animals 2020;10(4):647. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040647.

Veasey JS. In pursuit of peak animal welfare; the need to prioritize the meaningful over the measurable. Zoo Biology 2017;36(6):413–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21390.

Fenner K, Hyde M, Crean A, McGreevy P. Identifying sources of potential bias when using online survey data to explore horse training, management, and behaviour: a systematic literature review. Veterinary Science 2020;7(3):140. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7030140.

Andrews FM, Larson C, Harris P. Nutritional management of gastric ulceration. Equine Veterinary Education 2015;29(1):45–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.12495.

Hothersall B, Casey R. Undesired behaviour in horses: A review of their development, prevention, management and association with welfare. Equine Veterinary Education 2012;24(9):479–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3292.2011.00296.x.

Burla J-B, Ostertag A, Patt A, Bachmann I, Hillmann E. Effects of feeding management and group composition on agonistic behaviour of group-housed horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2016;176:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.01.011.

Verwijs R. The horse's behavioural and welfare needs for optimal foraging opportunities. UK-Vet Equine 2024;8(1):26–34. https://doi.org/10.12968/ukve.2024.8.1.26.

Littlewood KE, Heslop MV, Cobb ML. The agency domain and behavioral interactions: assessing positive animal welfare using the five domains model. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 2023;10:1284869. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1284869.

Benhajali H, Richard-Yris MA, Ezzaouia M, Charfi F, Hausberger M. Foraging opportunity: a crucial criterion for horse welfare? Animal 2009;3(9):1308–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109004820.

Rochais C, Henry S, Hausberger M. "Hay-bags" and "Slow feeders": Testing their impact on horse behaviour and welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2018;198:52–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.09.019.

Snoeks MG, Moons CPH, Ödberg FO, Aviron M, Geers R. Behavior of horses on pasture in relation to weather and shelter—A field study in a temperate climate. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2015;10(6):561–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2015.07.037.

Greening L, McBride S. A review of equine sleep: implications for equine welfare. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 2022;9:916737. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.916737.

Geor RJ, Harris P. Dietary management of obesity and insulin resistance: countering risk for laminitis. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 2009;25(1):51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2009.02.001.

Naydani CJ, Coombs T. Exercise as a welfare strategy? Insights from horse (Equus caballus) owners in the UK. Animal Welfare 2025;34:e14. https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2025.11.

McKeever KH. Exercise and rehabilitation of older horses. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 2016;32(2):317–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2016.04.008.

Dyson S. Can lameness be graded reliably? Equine Veterinary Journal 2011;43(4):379–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00391.x.

Simoes J, Sales Luis JP, Tilley P. Owner compliance to an environmental management protocol for severe equine asthma syndrome. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2020;87:102937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102937.

Jastrzebska E, Sadowska J, Wnuk-Pawlak E, Rozanska-Boczula M, Janczarek I. Exploratory behaviours of primitive horses based on konik: a preliminary study. Animals 2021;11(3)796. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030796.

Sarrafchi A, Blokhuis HJ. Equine stereotypic behaviors: causation, occurrence, and prevention. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2013;8(5):386–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2013.04.068.

Henderson JV, Waran NK. Reducing equine stereotypies using an Equiball™. Animal Welfare 2001;10:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600023277.

McBride S, Hemmings A. A neurologic perspective of equine stereotypy. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2009;29(1):10–6; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2008.11.008.

Wemelsfelder F. How animals communicate quality of life: the qualitative assessment of behaviour. Animal Welfare 2007;16(S1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600031699.