What Is Welfare? A Qualitative Study into Perceptions of Equine Welfare of Horse Owners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64292/ijes.219Keywords:
Equine welfare, equine husbandry, human–horse interaction, equitationAbstract
While existing literature broadly addresses equine welfare, limited research has explored horse owners' perspectives on welfare within the contexts of ownership. This study aimed to identify aspects of care and practice that horse owners consider essential for safeguarding equine welfare. An online survey comprising eight open-ended questions was analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. A total of 341 responses identified four higher-order themes: Equine Husbandry, Human–Horse Interaction, Equitation and Training, and Personal Development and Ethics. Equine Husbandry was the most frequently referenced theme, with respondents emphasizing the importance of appropriate housing and management practices, particularly the provision of year-round turnout, as central to equine welfare. Within the theme of Human–Horse Interaction, owners highlighted the need to understand equine behavior, recognize signs of stress, and treat horses as sentient beings deserving of respect, while avoiding anthropomorphism. The Equitation and Training theme underscored the importance of ethical, evidence-based training practices, including the correct use of tack and equipment. Many respondents expressed negative views toward the use of whips and spurs and stressed the value of qualified coaches who prioritize welfare-focused training. However, concerns were raised about entrenched or outdated coaching practices that may compromise welfare. Participants emphasized the importance of ongoing education, reflection, and a multidisciplinary approach to equine management, including collaboration with veterinarians, professional farriers, and saddle fitters. Despite widespread awareness of welfare considerations, findings suggest the persistence of a knowledge–practice gap. Focusing on education and evidence-based training is recommended to enhance the application of welfare principles in horse ownership.
References
Fiedler J, Slater J. Welfare of equine athletes in sport and the social license to operate. In: Hinchcliff KW, Kaneps AJ, Geor RJ, van Erck-Westergren E, editors. Equine Sports Medicine and Surgery (Third Edition), W.B. Saunders; 2024, p. 32–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-8370-9.00003-5.
Heleski CR. Social license to operate–why public perception matters for horse sport–some personal reflections. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2023;124:104266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104266.
Bradshaw-Wiley E, Randle H. The effect of stabling routines on potential behavioural indicators of affective state in horses and their use in assessing quality of life. Animals 2023;13:1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061065.
Rodgers E, Yates D, Woiwode R, Parrish B, Luck L. Stereotypic behaviors and physiological indicators of stress occur in horses with restricted durations of turnout. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2025;148:105481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105481.
Archer DC, Proudman CJ. Epidemiological clues to preventing colic. The Veterinary Journal 2006;172:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.04.002.
Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ, Littlewood KE, McLean AN, McGreevy PD, Jones B, et al. The 2020 five domains model: including human–animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare. Animals 2020;10:1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101870.
McLean AN, McGreevy PD. Horse-training techniques that may defy the principles of learning theory and compromise welfare. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2010;5:187–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2010.04.002.
Torell Palmquist G, Känsälä Alveheim N, Huot-Marchand F, Ashton L, Lewis V. The role of European equestrian institutions in training professionals: outcomes from a workshop on horse welfare in equestrian education. Animals 2025;15:183. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15020183.
Wolframm IA, Le Belle FA, Elte Y. What is welfare? A qualitative study into perceptions of equine welfare of the Dutch equestrian community. International Journal of Equine Science 2024;3:37–50. https://doi.org/10.64292/ijes.112.
Luke KL, Rawluk A, McAdie T, Smith BP, Warren-Smith AK. Investigating the motivational priorities underlying equestrians' horse-keeping and training practices. Anthrozoös 2024;37:479–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2024.2303228.
Maurício LS, Leme DP, Hötzel MJ. The easiest becomes the rule: beliefs, knowledge and attitudes of Equine Practitioners and enthusiasts regarding horse welfare. Animals 2024;14:1282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14091282.
Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today 2004;24:105–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
Goodwin D. Horse behaviour: Evolution, domestication and Feralisation. In: Waran N, editor. The Welfare of Horses, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2007, p. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48215-1_1.
Lansade L, Hartmann E, Minero M, Ruet A. Confinement, restriction of social contacts and movement in domestic horses. EURCAW Ruminants & Equines; 2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13785436.
Christensen JW. Behavioral biology of horses. Behavioral Biology of Laboratory Animals, CRC Press; 2021, p. 285–97.
Visser EK, Ellis AD, Van Reenen CG. The effect of two different housing conditions on the welfare of young horses stabled for the first time. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2008;114:521–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.03.003.
Lesimple C, Poissonnet A, Hausberger M. How to keep your horse safe? An epidemiological study about management practices. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2016;181:105–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.04.015.
Curtis L, Burford JH, England GCW, Freeman SL. Risk factors for acute abdominal pain (colic) in the adult horse: A scoping review of risk factors, and a systematic review of the effect of management-related changes. PLOS ONE 2019;14:e0219307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219307.
Scantlebury CE, Archer DC, Proudman CJ, Pinchbeck GL. Management and horse-level risk factors for recurrent colic in the UK general equine practice population. Equine Veterinary Journal 2015;47:202–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12276.
Hartmann E, Søndergaard E, Keeling LJ. Keeping horses in groups: A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2012;136:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.004.
Wolframm I, Engels T, Lindström M, Forssman K. Landscape of choice: The influence of landscape features on the behavior of sport horses. International Journal of Equine Science 2025;4:3–16. https://doi.org/10.64292/j2jkvt50.
ISES training principles. International Society of Equitation Science 2025. https://www.equitationscience.com/ises-training-principles (accessed January 19, 2026).
McLean AN, Christensen JW. The application of learning theory in horse training. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2017;190:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.020.
Lewis V, Andrzejewski L, Palmquist GT. The role of ethical, evidence-based practice and equine welfare in equestrian qualifications and education: outcomes from the International Group for Equestrian Qualifications workshop 2025.
Cakebread K, Lewis V. Are equestrian qualifications supporting equine welfare? A thematic analysis of British Horse Society's Stage 3–5 examination syllabi. Proceedings of the International Society for Equitation Science (ISES) Conference, 2025.
Warren-Smith AK, McGreevy PD. Equestrian coaches' understanding and application of learning theory in horse training. Anthrozoös 2008;21:153–62. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303708x305800.
Brown SM, Connor M. Understanding and application of learning theory in UK-based equestrians. Anthrozoös 2017;30:565–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2017.1370216.
Luke KL, McAdie T, Warren-Smith AK, Rawluk A, Smith BP. Does a working knowledge of learning theory relate to improved horse welfare and rider safety? Anthrozoös 2023;36:703–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2023.2166713.
Doherty O, Casey V, McGreevy P, Arkins S. Noseband use in equestrian sports – an international study. PLOS ONE 2017;12:e0169060. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169060.
McGreevy PD, Doherty O, Channon W, Kyrklund K, Webster J. The use of nosebands in equitation and the merits of an international equestrian welfare and safety committee: A commentary. The Veterinary Journal 2017;222:36–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.03.002.
Robinson N, Bye TL. Noseband and poll pressures underneath bitted and bitless bridles and the effects on equine locomotion. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2021;44:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2021.05.002.
Holmes TQ, Brown AF. Champing at the bit for improvements: a review of equine welfare in equestrian sports in the United Kingdom. Animals 2022;12:1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091186.
Lemon C, Lewis V, Dumbell L, Brown H. An investigation into equestrian spur use in the United Kingdom. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2020;36:40–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2019.10.009.
Maurstad A, Davis D, Cowles S. Co-being and intra-action in horse-human relationships: a multi-species ethnography of Be(com)ing human and Be(com)ing horse. Social Anthropology 2013;21:322–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12029.
Voigt MA, Hiney K, Richardson JC, Waite K, Borron A, Brady CM. Show horse welfare: Horse show competitors' understanding, awareness, and perceptions of equine welfare. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 2016;19:335–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2016.1152190.
Butler D, Valenchon M, Annan R, Whay HR, Mullan S. Living the 'best life' or 'one size fits all'—Stakeholder perceptions of racehorse welfare. Animals 2019;9:134. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040134.
Furtado T, Preshaw L, Hockenhull J, Wathan J, Douglas J, Horseman S, et al. How happy are equine athletes? Stakeholder perceptions of equine welfare issues associated with equestrian sport. Animals 2021;11:3228. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113228.
Hausberger M, Lesimple C, Henry S. Detecting welfare in a non-verbal species: social/cultural biases and difficulties in horse welfare assessment. Animals 2021;11:2249. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082249.
Fiedler JM, Ayre ML, Rosanowski S, Slater JD. Horse sector participants' attitudes towards anthropomorphism and animal welfare and wellbeing. Animals 2024;14:2482. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172482.
Stirling AE, Kerr GA. Abused athletes' perceptions of the coach-athlete relationship. Sport in Society 2009;12:227–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430430802591019.
Gervis M, Dunn N. The emotional abuse of elite child athletes by their coaches. Child Abuse Review 2004;13:215–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.843.
Goodwin D, McGreevy P, Waran N, McLean A. How equitation science can elucidate and refine horsemanship techniques. The Veterinary Journal 2009;181:5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.023.
Mageau GA, Vallerand RJ. The coach–athlete relationship: a motivational model. Journal of Sports Sciences 2003;21:883–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264041031000140374.
Kidman L. Athlete-centred coaching: Developing inspired and inspiring people. IPC Print Resources; 2005.
Wolframm IA, Douglas J, Pearson G. Changing hearts and minds in the equestrian world one behaviour at a time. Animals 2023;13:748. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040748.
Campbell MLH. An ethical framework for the use of horses in competitive sport: theory and function. Animals 2021;11:1725. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061725.
Paul ES, Podberscek AL. Veterinary education and students' attitudes towards animal welfare. Veterinary Record 2000;146:269–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.146.10.269.
Pickering P, Hockenhull J. Optimising the efficacy of equine welfare communications: do equine stakeholders differ in their information-seeking behaviour and communication preferences? Animals 2019;10:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010021.
Fletcher K, Cameron L, Freeman M. Contemplating the five domains model of animal welfare assessment: UK horse owner perceptions of equine well-being. Animal Welfare 2021;30:259–68. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.30.3.003.
Heleski CR, Mertig AG, Zanella AJ. Assessing attitudes toward farm animal welfare: A national survey of animal science faculty members1. Journal of Animal Science 2004;82:2806–14. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8292806x.
Paulhus DL, Reid DB. Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991;60:307–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.307.
Braun V, Clarke V. Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 2021;21:37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Data Availability Statement
Data storage was conducted according to the Research Data Management policy framework of Hartpury University. Data management adhered to the principles of Open Science, and data are available upon request.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Victoria Lewis, Sam Osborn, Christine Bjerkan, Gabriella Torell Palmquist, Inga Wolframm
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
How to Cite
