What Is Understood About the Welfare of Horses Working in Australian Cattle Feedlots: An Introductory Survey

Karly Liffen; Cathrynne Henshall; Hayley Randle

doi:10.64292/ijes.218

Authors

Karly Liffen Department of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 901 83, Sweden; School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, 2678, NSW, Australia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4008-2501
Cathrynne Henshall School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, 2678, NSW, Australia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0279-8805
Hayley Randle School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, 2678, NSW, Australia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4840-2650

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64292/ijes.218

Keywords:

Working horse, management, well-being, industry perception, agency

Abstract

Ridden horses are commonly used to manage cattle in feedlots in a range of countries, including Australia. While there is public concern about the welfare of cattle in feedlots, research into feedlot working horses and their welfare is lacking to date. Accordingly, an online survey was initially developed to ascertain the views of Australian animal and equine communities concerning this cohort of horses and the work they perform. In addition, respondents were asked about their views on animal welfare in general. The survey comprised a mixture of Likert scale questions consisting of six options, multiple-choice responses, and open-ended responses, and was completed by a total of 440 participants. The majority of participants were involved in the equine industry (95.87%), and therefore the findings reflect an equine industry viewpoint. Animal welfare in general was considered to be at a minimum important (χ² = 20.1, df = 5, P = 0.001), and animal well-being was considered extremely important (χ² = 10.59, df = 4, P = 0.032). Animal agency was considered important or very important by a majority (354) of participants (χ² = 10.6, df = 5, P = 0.06). Participants strongly agreed that cattle welfare has the potential to be improved by the use of horses on feedlots (χ² = 6.17, df = 2, P = 0.046). Participants clearly believe that animal and horse welfare is important both generally and in the feedlot industry. This aligns with wider community concerns about the welfare of animals used for, and in association with, food production.

References

Salvin HE, Lees AM, Cafe LM, Colditz IG, Lee C. Welfare of beef cattle in Australian feedlots: a review of the risks and measures. Animal Production Science 2020;60:1569–90. https://doi.org/10.1071/an19621.

Munsters C, Visser K, van den Broek J, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM. Quantifying stress in experienced and inexperienced mounted police horses, using heart rate, heart rate variability, behavior score and suitability score. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2013;8:e16–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2012.12.037.

Jovanović V, Vučinić M, Voslarova E, Nenadović K. Welfare assessment of stabled horses in five equestrian disciplines. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2024;143:105203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105203.

Klose RA, Berg EL. Stress-related behavior of horses in adapted therapeutic riding lessons and hippotherapy sessions. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2019;76:95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2019.03.133.

Trindade PHE, Hartmann E, Keeling LJ, Andersen PH, Ferraz G de C, Paranhos da Costa MJR. Effect of work on body language of ranch horses in Brazil. PLOS ONE 2020;15:e0228130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228130.

Rosser JM, Ardis A. Retrospective review of carriage horse and mule welfare in Charleston, South Carolina (2009–2012). Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2014;34:816–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2014.01.002.

Ali ABA, El Sayed MA, Matoock MY, Fouad MA, Heleski CR. A welfare assessment scoring system for working equids—A method for identifying at risk populations and for monitoring progress of welfare enhancement strategies (trialed in Egypt). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2016;176:52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.12.001.

Auer U, Kelemen Z, Engl V, Jenner F. Activity time budgets—a potential tool to monitor equine welfare? Animals 2021;11:850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030850.

McGreevy PD, Oddie C, Burton FL, McLean AN. The horse–human dyad: Can we align horse training and handling activities with the equid social ethogram? The Veterinary Journal 2009;181:12–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.005.

Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ, Littlewood KE, McLean AN, McGreevy PD, Jones B, et al. The 2020 five domains model: including human–animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare. Animals 2020;10:1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101870.

Heleski CR, Anthony R. Science alone is not always enough: The importance of ethical assessment for a more comprehensive view of equine welfare. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2012;7:169–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2011.08.003.

Burn CC, Dennison TL, Whay HR. Relationships between behaviour and health in working horses, donkeys, and mules in developing countries. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2010;126:109–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.06.007.

Hampton JO, Jones B, McGreevy PD. Social license and animal welfare: developments from the past decade in Australia. Animals 2020;10:2237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122237.

McManus P. Animal-based entertainment industries, animal death and Social Licence to Operate (SLO): an analysis of 'The Final Race' and the 2019 Melbourne Cup. Social & Cultural Geography 2022;24:1242–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2022.2053194.

Williams JM. Equestrianism's social license to operate: assumptions, reality and the future. UK-Vet Equine 2023;7:196–202. https://doi.org/10.12968/ukve.2023.7.5.196.

Heleski C, Stowe CJ, Fiedler J, Peterson ML, Brady C, Wickens C, et al. Thoroughbred racehorse welfare through the lens of 'social license to operate—with an emphasis on a U.S. perspective. Sustainability 2020;12:1706. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051706.

Jones B, Goodfellow J, Yeates J, McGreevy P. A critical analysis of the British Horseracing Authority's review of the use of the whip in horseracing. Animals 2015;5:138–50. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani5010138.

Mellor D. Updating animal welfare thinking: moving beyond the "five freedoms" towards "a life worth living." Animals 2016;6:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6030021.

Johnston CH, Richardson VL, Whittaker AL. How well does Australian animal welfare policy reflect scientific evidence: a case study approach based on lamb marking. Animals 2023;13:1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081358.

Pearson G, Douglas J, Wolframm I, Furtado T. Used like pawns or treated like kings? How narratives around racehorse welfare in the 2023 Grand National may affect public acceptance: an informed commentary. Animals 2023;13:3137. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13193137.

Wilson BJ, Thompson KR, McGreevy PD. The race that segments a nation: Findings from a convenience poll of attitudes toward the Melbourne Cup Thoroughbred horse race, gambling and animal cruelty. PLOS ONE 2021;16:e0248945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248945.

Tannenbaum J. Ethics in biomedical animal research: the key role of the investigator a. In: Conn, PM, editor. Animal Models for the Study of Human Disease. Second Edition, Academic Press; 2017, p. 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809468-6.00001-2.

Weary DM, Ventura BA, von Keyserlingk MAG. Societal views and animal welfare science: understanding why the modified cage may fail and other stories. Animal 2016;10:309–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731115001160.

Williams JM, Randle H, Marlin D. COVID-19: Impact on United Kingdom horse owners. Animals 2020;10:1862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101862.

Hausberger M, Lesimple C, Henry S. Detecting welfare in a non-verbal species: social/cultural biases and difficulties in horse welfare assessment. Animals 2021;11:2249. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082249.

Heleski CR. Social license to operate–why public perception matters for horse sport–some personal reflections. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2023;124:104266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104266.

Mellor DJ, Burns M. Using the five domains model to develop welfare assessment guidelines for thoroughbred horses in New Zealand. N Z Vet J 2020;68:150–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2020.1715900.

Bukhari SSUH, Parkes RSV, Sneddon LU, McElligott AG. The behavior and welfare of neglected species: some examples from fish and mammals. PeerJ 2024;12:e17149. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17149.

Luke KL, Rawluk A, McAdie T, Smith BP, Warren-Smith AK. How equestrians conceptualise horse welfare: Does it facilitate or hinder change? Animal Welfare 2023;32:e59. https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2023.79.

Croney CC. Words matter: Implications of semantics and imagery in framing animal-welfare issues. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 2010;37:101–6. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.37.1.101.

Goto Y, Tsugawa K, Furuya Y, Maezato M, Tagami Y, Ogawa Y, et al. Behavior of Japanese women after being informed about the benefits and disadvantages of breast cancer screening: a questionnaire survey. Breast Cancer 2020;27:739–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01071-6.

Fletcher K, Cameron L, Freeman M. Contemplating the Five Domains model of animal welfare assessment: UK horse owner perceptions of equine well-being. Animal Welfare 2021;30:259–68. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.30.3.003.

Maurício LS, Leme DP, Hötzel MJ. The easiest becomes the rule: beliefs, knowledge and attitudes of Equine Practitioners and enthusiasts regarding horse welfare. Animals (Basel) 2024;14:1282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14091282.

Pickering P, Hockenhull J. Optimising the efficacy of equine welfare communications: do equine stakeholders differ in their information-seeking behaviour and communication preferences? Animals 2019;10:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010021.

Randle H, Waran N. Equitation science in practice: how collaboration, communication and change can improve equine welfare. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2019;29:viii–x. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2018.12.014.

Cobb M, Lill A, Bennett P. Not all dogs are equal: perception of canine welfare varies with context. Animal Welfare 2020;29:27–35. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.29.1.027.

Cheung E, Mills D, Ventura BA. "But my horse is well cared for": A qualitative exploration of cognitive dissonance and enculturation in equestrian attitudes toward performance horses and their welfare. Animal Welfare 2025;34:e50. https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2025.10028.

Silber H, Stadtmüller S, Cernat A. Comparing participation motives of professional and non-professional respondents. International Journal of Market Research 2023;65:361–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853231166882.

FEI dressage rules. FEI 2025. https://inside.fei.org/fei/disc/dressage/rules (accessed March 20, 2026).

Reimert I, Webb LE, van Marwijk MA, Bolhuis JE. Review: Towards an integrated concept of animal welfare. Animal 2023;17:100838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100838.

Mendl M, Burman OHP, Parker RMA, Paul ES. Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2009;118:161–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.023.

Bornmann T, Randle H, Williams J. Investigating equestrians' perceptions of horse happiness: an exploratory study. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2021;104:103697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103697.

De Vere AJ, Kuczaj SA. Where are we in the study of animal emotions? WIREs Cognitive Science 2016;7:354–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1399.

Lawrence AB, Terlouw EMC. A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 1993;71:2815–25. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71102815x.

Mota-Rojas D, Mariti C, Zdeinert A, Riggio G, Mora-Medina P, del Mar Reyes A, et al. Anthropomorphism and its adverse effects on the distress and welfare of companion animals. Animals 2021;11:3263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113263.

White L. The role of the horse in Australian tourism and national identity. In: Frew E, White L, editors. Tourism and National Identities: An international perspective, Routledge; 2011, p. 65–76.

Watts PJ, Davis RJ, Keane OB, Luttrell MM, Tucker RW, Stafford R, et al. Beef cattle feedlots: Design and construction. Meat & Livestock Australia; 2016.

Grandin T. Livestock-handling assessments to improve the welfare of cattle, pigs and sheep. Animal Production Science 2017;58:403–7. https://doi.org/10.1071/an16800.

Grandin T, Oldfield JE, Boyd LJ. Review: Reducing handling stress improves both productivity and welfare. The Professional Animal Scientist 1998;14:1–10. https://doi.org/10.15232/s1080-7446(15)31783-6.